Open Access Article
Modern Social Science Research. 2025; 5: (4) ; 137-140 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ssr.20250155.
The generation of the relationship between ethnic behavior and social institutions in Frederick Barth's " Political Leadership among the Swat Pathans"
弗雷德里克·巴特《斯瓦巴坦人的政治过程》中族群边界与社会制度关系的生成
作者:
郝明葳 *
云南师范大学 云南昆明
*通讯作者:
郝明葳,单位:云南师范大学 云南昆明;
发布时间: 2025-04-27 总浏览量: 62
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
摘要
挪威人类学家弗雷德里克·巴特的《斯瓦特巴坦人的政治过程》聚焦族群行为与社会制度的动态生成关系,提出“场景论族群模式”。对斯瓦特巴坦人的政治生态分析,巴特强调族群边界并非固定地理或文化实体,而是通过成员互动和主观认知建构的社会产物。族群认同以父系血缘、种姓、婚姻联盟等要素为基础,但边界的流动性体现在个体基于利益的选择性结盟与资源竞争中。斯瓦特社会制度以行动者为中心,政治权力通过土地分配、契约关系和首领竞争动态形成,呈现不稳定特征。巴特突破结构功能主义范式,揭示个体能动性在秩序生成中的作用,挑战了传统人类学对集体规范的静态解释。其研究为理解族群与制度的互动提供了从“边界”到“过程”的视角转向。
关键词: 巴特;族群边界;社会制度;政治过程;能动性
Abstract
Frederik Barth's "Political Processes among the Swat Pathans" focuses on the dynamic relationship between ethnic behavior and social institutions, and proposes the "scene theory of ethnic groups". In his analysis of the political ecology of the Swat Pathans, Barth emphasizes that ethnic boundaries are not fixed geographical or cultural entities, but rather social products constructed through the interaction of members and subjective cognition. Ethnic identity is based on elements such as patrilineal blood ties, caste, and marital alliances, but the fluidity of boundaries is reflected in the selective alliances and resource competition based on individual interests. The social institutions of Swat are centered on actors, and political power is dynamically formed through land distribution, contractual relationships, and competition for leadership, presenting an unstable characteristic. Barth breaks through the structural functionalism paradigm, revealing the role of individual agency in the formation of order and challenging the static interpretation of collective norms in traditional anthropology. His research provides a perspective shift from "boundaries" to "processes" for understanding the interaction between ethnic groups and institutions.
Key words: Barth; Ethnic boundaries; Social institutions; Political processes; Agency
参考文献 References
[1] [美]康拉德·科塔克.人类学:人类多样性的探索[M].黄剑波译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012:309-301.
[2] [美]凡勃伦.有闲阶级论[M].蔡受百译.北京:商务印书馆,1964:139.
[3] [挪]弗雷德里克·巴特.族群与边界[M].李丽琴译.北京:商务印书馆,2014:129.
[4] Brubaker, Rogers, Mara Loveman, and Peter Stamatov. “Ethnicity as Cognition”[J] .Theory and Society, 2004(33) : 31-64.
[5] [挪]弗雷德里克·巴特.斯瓦特巴坦人的政治过程[M].黄建生译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005:3.
[6] 范可.何以“边”为:巴特“族群边界”理论的启迪[J].学术月刊,2017,49(07):99-110.
[7] 周大鸣.论族群与族群关系[J].广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2001(02):13-25.
[8] 夏希原.巴特的行动者理论与族群族界观[J].世界民族,2013(04):38-45.
[9] 罗柳宁.族群研究综述[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2004(04):5-16.
[10] 王明珂.华夏边缘:历史记忆与族群认同[M].北京:社会科学出版社,2006:4.
引用本文
郝明葳, 弗雷德里克·巴特《斯瓦巴坦人的政治过程》中族群边界与社会制度关系的生成[J]. 现代社会科学研究, 2025; 5: (4) : 137-140.