摘要
赵树理作为中国现当代文学中山药蛋派的代表作家，其乡土小说以生活化语言绘制出20世纪中期中国乡村社会的文学图谱。在赵树理的文学世界中，宗族关系、政治变革与外来文明共同构成农民认知的镜像场域。小说中农民对土地的本能依恋与现代性冲击下的认知迷茫，共同构成社会转型期的文化心理症候。这种文学表达不仅揭示出乡土权力结构对农民主体的镜像式规训，更通过身份构建的微观视角与时代变革的宏观视角交织，在传统人文精神与现代性反思之间建立起独特的文学纽带。
关键词： 赵树理小说；拉康镜像理论；主体意识
Abstract
As a representative writer of the Shanxi School (Yao-dan School) in modern and contemporary Chinese literature, Zhao Shuli's rural novels depict a literary map of China's rural society in the mid-20th century with life-oriented language. In Zhao Shuli's literary world, clan relations, political changes, and foreign civilizations together form a mirror field for farmers' cognition. The peasants' instinctive attachment to the land and their cognitive confusion under the impact of modernity in the novels constitute the cultural-psychological syndrome of the social transition period. This literary expression not only reveals the mirror-like discipline of the rural power structure over the peasant subject, but also establishes a unique literary bond between traditional humanistic spirit and modernity reflection through the interweaving of the micro-perspective of identity construction and the macro-perspective of historical changes.
Key words： Zhao Shuli's novels; Lacan's Mirror Theory; Subject consciousness
参考文献 References
[1] Jiaxin Zou; Yuqing Wang.Self-identity's Construction Process in The Moon and Sixpence from Lacan’s Theory of the Mirror[J].Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences.Volume6, Issue12. 2024:PP123-12.
[2] Licandro Daniela.Affective Chinese Socialist Realism: A Reading of Zhao Shuli’s Sanliwan Village[J]. Chinese Literature and Thought Today.Volume55, Issue1-2.2024: PP 67-79.
[3] Malin B D. Kohut and Lacan: mirror opposites[J]. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 2011, 31(1): 58-74.
[4] Mu-zi L I U. From Mirror Theory to Oedipus Complex: A Lacanian Interpretation of Night, Mother[J]. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 2024, 14(9): 759-764.
[5] Xiaoping Wang.“Problem Stories” as Part of the “National Form”: Rural Society in Transition and Zhao Shuli’s Peasant Stories[J].Frontiers of Literary Studies in China.Volume 6,Issue 2.2012:PP208-231.
[6] 范雪.生活的活力:赵树理小说与根据地基层文化[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2022(06):105-113.
[7] 胡成恩.拉康“镜像理论”对笛卡儿以来“自我”观的还原与重构[J].宁夏社会科学,2018(03):20-26.
[8] 季玢.论赵树理小说的乡村文化建构[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,32(04):150-154.
[9] 金炜洺.“破局者”赵树理——论赵树理对中国乡土小说的革新与发展[J].中州大学学报,2023,40(02):13-18.
[10] 李冬春.赵树理文学创作中的农民形象解读——评《李家庄的变迁》[J].热带作物学报,2020,41(06):1294.
[11] 刘晶.论赵树理的小说叙事风格——浓郁的乡土情结[J].文化学刊,2019(06):92-94.
[12] 刘雪琴.论民间隐形结构下的中间人物——以赵树理合作化小说为例[J].忻州师范学院学报,2022,38(06):42-48+54.
[13] 罗先海.现代性视域下乡土中国的当代图景[D].长沙：湖南师范大学,2010.
[14] 刘江伟,杨珏.用大众语言传递时代脉动[N].光明日报,2025.04-28(009).2025.
[15] 魏信迪,吴淑玄.文学场域与身份建构：赵树理农村写作的进退维艰[J].大众文艺,2025,(06):19-21.
[16] 洪海涵.基于拉康三界理论的《终结的感觉》主体建构研究[J].长江小说鉴赏,2025,(08):72-75.
[17] 李思贤.“出走”的寓言式叙事模式下觉醒女性的镜像探究——读里尔克的《布里格手记》[J].白城师范学院学报,2025,39(01):65-71.
[18] 拉康. 拉康选集.[M] 上海: 上海三联出版社,2001.
[19] 米歇尔·福柯.文字即垃圾：危机之后的文学.[M]重庆：重庆大学出版社,2016.