期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Modern Social Science Research. 2026; 6: (10) ; 138-142 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ssr.20260340.

The investigation and enhancement of English teachers’ digital instructional competency from the perspective of smart teaching
智慧教学视域下英语教师数字化教学能力调查与提升研究

作者: 廖乃帜1, 苏全彩2 *

1广西财经学院基础教育学院 广西南宁

2南宁师范大学外国语学院 广西南宁

*通讯作者: 苏全彩,单位:南宁师范大学外国语学院 广西南宁 ;

发布时间: 2026-10-22 总浏览量: 13 下载量: 加载中...

摘要

智慧教学背景下,高校英语教师必须提高自身数字素养和数字化教学能力。通过文献梳理构建了包含数字技术素养、智慧教学设计能力、智慧资源创生能力、数据教学应用以及数字伦理素养五个维度的理论框架。采用问卷调查与深度访谈相结合的方法,对多所高校英语教师展开实证调研。调查显示,教师在数字技术素养(均值4.1)和数字伦理素养(均值4.0)层面表现良好,但智慧资源创生能力(均值2.8)和智慧教学设计能力(均值3.2)成为明显短板。质性访谈揭示,教师内在发展动力不足、培训供给与教学需求错位、教研协作缺失是制约能力提升的三大现实堵点。据此,本文从教师个体自我发展意识唤醒、院校培训模式革新与评价机制优化、校际学习共同体构建三个层面提出系统化提升路径。望能助力英语教师实现数字化教学能力提高,充分提高AI在英语课堂中的赋能价值。

关键词: 智慧教学;数字化教学能力;教师专业发展

Abstract

Under the background of smart teaching, English teachers in higher education institutions should enhance their digital literacy and teaching competence. First, through literature review, five-dimensional theoretical framework was constructed, including technological literacy, digital teaching design competence, digital resource development capacity, data-driven teaching competency, and digital ethics and awareness. Then, an investigation was conducted among English teachers from different universities through questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Surveys show that teachers perform well in digital technology literacy (mean = 4.1) and digital ethics literacy (mean = 4.0). However, their capabilities in creating smart resources (mean = 2.8) and designing smart teaching plans (mean = 3.2) are notable weaknesses. Qualitative interviews reveal three practical bottlenecks restricting competency improvement: teachers’ insufficient internal motivation for development, the mismatch between training provision and teaching demands, and the lack of teaching research collaboration. Accordingly, this paper proposes a systematic improvement pathway from three dimensions: awakening teachers’ awareness of individual self-development, innovating institutional training models and optimizing evaluation mechanisms, and building inter-school learning communities. It is expected to help English teachers enhance their digital teaching competencies and maximize the empowering value of AI in English classrooms.

Key words: Smart teaching; Digital teaching competency; Teachers’ professional development

参考文献 References

[1] 陈坚林.外语教育数字化转型中的教材形态研究[J].外语教材研究, 2024(2):78-88.

[2] 陈坚林.数智赋能背景下外语教师数字化教学能力构建研究[J].上海理工大学学报(社会科学版),2025(1):7-12.

[3] Redecker C. European framework for the digital competence of educator: DigCompEdu [M]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017:13.

[4] 贾雪娇.欧盟教师数字化能力框架的主要内容及特点[J].教师教育学报,2022(5):73-82.

[5] 洪化清,乔玉飞.外语教育数字化转型的要素、挑战与路径[J].外语界, 2024(3): 28-33.

[6] 苏全彩.批判性视角下地区师范类高校外语教师的可持续发展研究[J].湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2017(7):141.

[7] 邓磊,钟颖.智能时代教师教育生态的反思与重构[J].教师教育学报,2020(5):1-10.

[8] 林洁.数字赋能:在线学习社群中知识共享活动的优化研究[J].教育理论与实践,2022(15):48-51.

引用本文

廖乃帜, 苏全彩, 智慧教学视域下英语教师数字化教学能力调查与提升研究[J]. 现代社会科学研究, 2026; 6: (10) : 138-142.