摘要
人工智能技术的快速应用使刑法因果关系判断面临全新困境,传统理论以“人的主观罪过支配下的实行行为”为核心构建的因果关系与结果归属体系,在智能算法自主决策、多主体介入的场景中出现适用障碍。本文剖析人工智能对传统理论中实行行为定型性、因果流程认定、结果归属规则的三重挑战,依托我国刑法立法与司法实践,提出以重构路径,明确人工智能场景下因果关系判断的层级规则与责任归属边界,为司法实践提供理论参考。
关键词: 人工智能;刑法因果关系;危险现实化;结果归属;实行行为
Abstract
The rapid application of artificial intelligence technology has presented new challenges to the judgment of criminal law causal relationship. The causal relationship and result attribution system constructed by traditional theories based on "the act performed under the subjective fault of the person" has encountered application obstacles in scenarios where intelligent algorithms make autonomous decisions and multiple entities are involved. This paper analyzes the threefold challenges of artificial intelligence to the traditional theory regarding the stereotypical nature of the act, the determination of causal process, and the rules of result attribution. Relying on China's criminal law legislation and judicial practice, it proposes a reconstruction approach to clarify the hierarchical rules and responsibility attribution boundaries for causal relationship judgment in artificial intelligence scenarios, providing theoretical references for judicial practice.
Key words: Artificial intelligence; Criminal law causal relationship; Danger realization; Result attribution; Act of execution
参考文献 References
[1] 余鑫扬. 刑法因果关系判断的理论反思:基于“复合条件说导向的二阶模式”[J].中南法律评论,2025,(00):150-165.
[2] 陈璐. 过失竞合理论下人工智能致损的刑事责任分配[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025,58(06):73-79+171.
[3] 刘艳红. 刑法因果关系理论的横断切面与危险的现实说之确立[J].政治与法律,2024,(08):64-82.
[4] 石经海,赵春雨.刑法治理的现代化与本土化讲演录[M].中国社会科学出版社:202311:567.
[5] 宋振武. 作为冗余理论的刑法学因果关系学说[J].烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,36(05):106-113.
[6] 蒋太珂. 因果力比较规则的刑法理论构造[J].法学研究,2023,45(01):108-124.
[7] 李阜蒙,储陈城. 刑法因果关系的立场选择和理论纠偏[J].哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报,2023,14(01):75-79.
[8] 钱叶六. 刑法因果关系理论的重要发展与立场选择[J].中国刑事法杂志,2022,(04):95-111.
[9] 车浩,于改之.因果关系的理论与实务[M].北京大学出版社:202206:134.