摘要
本文以了解法汉两种语言在识别现实和抽象实体容纳空间背景时可能产生的构式选择偏误为主要研究方向，从理论角度分析实体空间属性与意象图式对容纳空间背景认知可能施加的影响。整体来看，当充当背景的实体自身所具有的空间属性有限，且在容纳特征不够典型的情况下，容易引起对构式使用的不同选择；另一方面，对空间的认知受意象图式影响较大，特别是在抽象实体充当容纳空间背景时，不同图式间的交叉替代，都为语言差异的产生带来了可能。
关键词： 空间背景；体认差异；构式偏误
Abstract
The main research direction of this paper is to understand the possible constructional selection errors in the recognition of reality and abstract entity of containment spatial grounding in French and Chinese languages. On the whole, when the entity serving as grounding has limited spatial attributes, and when the accommodating characteristics are not typical enough, it is easy to cause selective error for the use of constructions; on the other hand, the perception of space is affected by the image schema. The impact is greater, especially when abstract entities serve as the grounding of the containment, the cross-substitution of different schemas brings the possibility of language differences.
Key words： Spatial grounding; Embodied-cognitive difference; Construction error
参考文献 References
[1] 王晓磊.论西方哲学空间概念的双重演进逻辑[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2010(4):113-119.
[2] 张克定、张晓.抽象方位关系的体认理据与编码限制[J].解放军外国语学院学报.2021(2):18-23.
[3] 郭熙煌.语言空间概念与结构认知研究[M].武汉:湖北教育出版社,2012.
[4] 王寅.后现代哲学视野下的体认语言学[J].外国语文,2014(6):61-67.
[5] 张克定.空间关系构式的认知研究[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2016.
[6] Kövecses, Z. Levels of metaphor[J].Cognitive Linguistics, 2017 (2): 321-347.
[7] Vandeloise, C. L’Espace en français[M].Paris: Édition du Seuil, 1986.
[8] Dodge, E. & G, Lakoff. Image schemas: from linguistic analysis to neural grounding in B, Hampe (ed.). From Perception to Meaning[M].Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005.
[9] Johnson, M.The body in mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason[M].Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,1987.
[10] Talmy, L.Force dynamics in language and in cognition[J]. Cognitive Science,1988(12):49-100.
[11] 刘光明、储泽祥.里外关系的四种表达式及其标记模式[J].语言研究,2005(3):20-23.
[12] 刘国辉.汉语空间方位词“上”的认知语义构式体系[J].四川外语学院学报,2008(2):13-17.
[13] 缑瑞隆.方位词“上”“下”的语义认知基础与对外汉语教学[J].语言文字应用,2004(4):69-75.